| Mary BATES-NEUBAUER |
USA
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
| TITRE / TITLE | Moonrise
and Set-30 Days, Phoenix, Arizona |
| POSITION
dans le Parc de Sculpture Virtuelle (DAAP) LOCATION in the Virtual Sculpture Park (DAAP) |
30N
6E |
| CATEGORIE / CATEGORY | VRW |
| WEB SITE | http://www.sculpture-digital.net/ |
| ARTIST
BIOGRAPHY and
STATEMENT BIOGRAPHIE et COMMENTAIRES DE L'ARTISTE |
|
| Biographie /
Biography : Mary Bates Neubauer has shown her work nationally and internationally. She is represented by Bentley Gallery, Scottsdale, AZ, Bentley Projects, Phoenix, AZ, and the William Havu Gallery, Denver, CO. Recent exhibitions include Solar Streams, at the Edinburgh College of Art and the Dick Institute in Scotland, The Politics of Water, Northern Arizona Museum of Art, Inside Information, the Computing Commons Gallery, Arizona State University, The International Rapid Prototyping Exhibition, Southwestern University, TX, Iron Maidens, the Tucson Museum of Art, the Master of Graphic Arts Biennial, Gyor, Hungary, and the TeleSculpture I, II, & III international digital art exhibitions. Neubauer is a professor at Arizona State University, and is affiliated with ASU’s Partnership for Research in Spatial Modeling. Mary has been the recipient a Ford Fellowship and a Fulbright Fellowship in Cambridge, England. She has served as a visiting artist at the Kohler Arts/Industry program, Oxbow, the University of Minnesota, San Jose State University, Edinburgh College of Art, Scotland, the Falmouth School of Art, England, CAST, Ltd. Dublin, Ireland, Andersen Ranch Arts Center, and the University of Alaska. Commentaire / Statement : Current work uses visual information obtained through digital processes to create and record 3D data. Illuminated, processed photograms, laser-scanned images, animations, and rapid prototypes are combined with more traditional casting and replication techniques to address contemporary science and its information-gathering methods. The work examines the way collectible materials and archived, and data is acquired, valued, and presented. It raises questions about how scientific and technical findings are interpreted and what effect this has upon our understanding of the nature of empirical evidence. |
|